"Peter Popov" wrote:
>
> No.
>
> For a more precise answer... think about it, why are we using photons
> at all? If specular highlights and faked caustics were enough, there
> would be no need of photons. Yet there is... I am sure Nathan Kopp,
> and Hendrik van Jensen before that, didn't invest years in vain.
>

But imho lensflares aren't caustics but multiple specular reflections of a
light source.
So why do you need photons to simulate them?

Post a reply to this message